Differenze tra le versioni di "Button filler/en"

Da FountainPen.
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Creata pagina con "In fact, in addition to the previous advantages, this system also has some disadvantages. First of all, the system is more cumbersome and requires a good positioning of the fl...")
(Creata pagina con "Nevertheless, the system was quite successful and was reused by various European manufacturers. In particular, an interesting variant is the ''push-knob'' made by Montbl...")
Riga 9: Riga 9:
 
In fact, in addition to the previous advantages, this system also has some disadvantages. First of all, the system is more cumbersome and requires a good positioning of the flexible strip, also the filling capacity is limited, not being able to have the button a large excursion, and thus obtaining a flexion, and consequent compression, limited. Finally, pressing the button requires a certain amount of effort.  
 
In fact, in addition to the previous advantages, this system also has some disadvantages. First of all, the system is more cumbersome and requires a good positioning of the flexible strip, also the filling capacity is limited, not being able to have the button a large excursion, and thus obtaining a flexion, and consequent compression, limited. Finally, pressing the button requires a certain amount of effort.  
  
Ciò nonostante il sistema ebbe un discreto successo e venne riutilizzato da vari produttori europei. In particolare una variante interessante è il ''[[push-knob]]'' realizzato dalla [[Montblanc]], in cui il fondello stesso serve da pulsante. Esso infatti può essere svitato parzialmente fino a portarlo in una posizione in cui viene agganciato il pulsante interno su cui è ancorata la molla metallica, premendo il fondello si effettua la compressione della molla ed il relativo caricamento della penna. Una volta completato il caricamento il fondello può essere riportato in posizione di blocco per evitare pressioni accidentali.
+
Nevertheless, the system was quite successful and was reused by various European manufacturers. In particular, an interesting variant is the ''[[push-knob]]'' made by [[Montblanc]], in which the blind cap itself serves as a button. In fact, it can be partially unscrewed until it is brought into a position where the internal button on which the metal spring is anchored is hooked, pressing the blind cap compresses the spring and loads the pen. Once filling is complete, the blind cap can be returned to the locked position to avoid accidental pressure.
  
 
Un'altra variante è quella brevettata dalla [[Soennecken]] nel 1930, che prevede un pulsante di ebanite nascosto da un guscio ruotando il quale si può raggiungere il pulsante di caricamento ed azionarlo, mentre ruotandolo in direzione inversa questo viene riportato nella posizione originale, bloccando l'accesso al pulsante. Entrambe le varianti consentono di ovviare ad un altro non trascurabile problema della versione classica, che è la non trascurabile probabilità di perdere il fondellino svitabile.<noinclude>
 
Un'altra variante è quella brevettata dalla [[Soennecken]] nel 1930, che prevede un pulsante di ebanite nascosto da un guscio ruotando il quale si può raggiungere il pulsante di caricamento ed azionarlo, mentre ruotandolo in direzione inversa questo viene riportato nella posizione originale, bloccando l'accesso al pulsante. Entrambe le varianti consentono di ovviare ad un altro non trascurabile problema della versione classica, che è la non trascurabile probabilità di perdere il fondellino svitabile.<noinclude>

Versione delle 12:43, 25 ago 2019

The button filler was introduced by Parker in 1913.[1] The system was born from the need to find an alternative to the Sheaffer lever filler not copying the design thus avoiding all possible legal problems due to patents.

Diagram of a pen with button filler

In this case, the system requires that the compression of the rubber sac is carried out through a flexible metal strip (often called "I-bar") that is curved by pressing it with a button on the bottom of the pen. The strip in the rest position is straight and resting on one side of the pen body. On the underside it is placed in contrast with the nib assembly (in some cases a special recess is created on the body itself). On the upper side it comes out, through a curved end, from a hole made on the bottom of the pen, and inserted into a metal button.

Pressing the button causes the rod to bend towards the center of the pen, causing the sac compression. Again, a pressure bar is used to make the sac more evenly compressed. The advantage of this system is that there is no need for a side slit in the pen body. The fact that the access to the button was protected by an screw-on blind cap allowed to affirm a greater security than the loss of ink in case of breakage of the bag, also the system was promoted for its ability to allow the loading of the pen with one hand.

In fact, in addition to the previous advantages, this system also has some disadvantages. First of all, the system is more cumbersome and requires a good positioning of the flexible strip, also the filling capacity is limited, not being able to have the button a large excursion, and thus obtaining a flexion, and consequent compression, limited. Finally, pressing the button requires a certain amount of effort.

Nevertheless, the system was quite successful and was reused by various European manufacturers. In particular, an interesting variant is the push-knob made by Montblanc, in which the blind cap itself serves as a button. In fact, it can be partially unscrewed until it is brought into a position where the internal button on which the metal spring is anchored is hooked, pressing the blind cap compresses the spring and loads the pen. Once filling is complete, the blind cap can be returned to the locked position to avoid accidental pressure.

Un'altra variante è quella brevettata dalla Soennecken nel 1930, che prevede un pulsante di ebanite nascosto da un guscio ruotando il quale si può raggiungere il pulsante di caricamento ed azionarlo, mentre ruotandolo in direzione inversa questo viene riportato nella posizione originale, bloccando l'accesso al pulsante. Entrambe le varianti consentono di ovviare ad un altro non trascurabile problema della versione classica, che è la non trascurabile probabilità di perdere il fondellino svitabile.

Note

  1. at least as reported on this story of the initial Parker models, the first Parker patents related to loading, nº US-1346045 and nº US-1486246, are respectively from 1919 and 1922, certainly after the introduction, since the Duofold is also from 1922 and the system also appears in this 1916 advertising, in this discussion however is reported the purchase by the Parker of the patent nº US-787152, which is from 1905.

Brevetti correlati

  • Brevetto n° DE-505420, del 1930-08-18, richiesto il 1928-12-29, Kosca. Sistema di caricamento.
  • Brevetto n° DE-565366, del 1932-11-30, richiesto il 1931-03-06, Fend. Sistema di caricamento.
  • Brevetto n° FR-739163, del 1933-01-06, richiesto il 1932-06-27, Edacoto. Sistema di caricamento.
  • Brevetto n° GB-532979, del 1941-02-04, richiesto il 1939-09-28, di Albert J. Good, Mentmore. Sistema di caricamento.